BreakPoint Columns
|
Strategies for a Tilted World Worldview and YouBy: Tom Gilson|Published: May 22, 2012 5:22 PM Topics: Apologetics, Education, Ethics, History, Marriage & Family, Religion & Society, Sexual Ethics A man once ordained priest in Rome writes on CNN’s Belief Blog of “knee-jerk” Christianity, too bigoted and irrational to recognize our own Scripture’s approval of homosexuality. An influential advocate against bullying in schools drives dozens of students from the room, some of them in tears, calling out obscenities on the Bible’s moral backwardness about slavery and sexuality. And a sitting President of the United States comes out in favor of gay “marriage.” Do you feel the world tipping sideways on you? I was driving home from work some fifteen or twenty years ago, listening to the news, when I heard that Boy Scouts in Pennsylvania were being denied use of public meeting space, because of their discriminatory stance toward homosexuals. I had the eeriest feeling at that moment, as if the farmland around me were lurching, almost about to turn upside down on top of me. The Boy Scouts were always the good guys, almost too good for some people’s tastes, when I was a kid. When did they become the bad guys?! Today that question almost seems quaint. Now it’s not just the Boy Scouts. Christians have become the bad guys. We’re fighting (so it is said) against gays’ civil rights, women’s right to choose, life-saving embryonic stem cell research. We’re the backward ones, the stupid ones, the bad ones. Am I overstating it? I don’t think so. Daniel Helminiak, writing in the above-mentioned CNN Belief Blog, says the President’s support for gay “marriage”
He later adds, “Were God-given reason to prevail, rather than knee-jerk religion, we would not be having a heated debate over gay marriage.” He is too polite, or perhaps too sophisticated, to use the words bad and stupid, but his intent is exactly that. CNN gave him the platform to say so. The ground around us has tilted. Granted, we Christians, who measure our lives and practices too much by the world’s standards rather than God’s, are indeed somewhat askew. We have been not always been good, and we have not always been wise. God help us; God forgive us. But it is not Christianity that is tilted. It is not Jesus Christ who is lurching. He is our rock, the solid, level place on which we can find sure footing. If the world is twisting and rocking and diving, it is doing so around a fixed and stable plane. We need not be dismayed by its gyrations. We need not let them cause us to stumble drunkenly, as on a ship tossed by waves. Yet we must be wise; for in its twisted way the world is wise. As far back as Aristotle, it has been known that persuasive credibility (ethos, in the philosopher’s terms) depends on one’s intellectual competence and ethical trustworthiness. That’s precisely where the world is aiming its attack on Christianity. It’s good strategy. How shall we respond? I’ve stated the opposition strategy in simple language: making us out to be bad and stupid. The answer, of course, is to be knowledgeable and wise and good. On one level it’s really that simple, and when it comes to strategies, simplicity is a virtue. If ever the church were to come together to strategize for the life of our culture and our nation, we ought to do so asking, “How can we combat the lie that we are bad and stupid? How can we show that the faith is wise and good? How can we demonstrate that in our own lives?” I don’t know if we’ll ever have that strategic conversation, but that doesn’t mean we can’t mount a strategic response. I have four recommendations to offer. I present them here in an order that seems easiest for me to communicate, not in order of importance. They are all crucial. First, we must answer the lies spoken against us. Take for example the charge, mentioned above, that the Bible’s position on slavery is morally backward. The fact is that the Bible’s position was always well advanced by comparison to surrounding culture, and down through history its demonstrated effect has been to reduce and then eliminate slavery. This charge against the Bible is false. Or consider the common charge that biblical Christianity is oppressive toward women. This too is false with respect to Christianity in its original cultural context, and also in its historic effect on women’s rights. Compare Islam’s treatment of women, or the former practice of sati in India, in which widows were required by law and/or custom to immolate themselves on their husband’s funeral pyres. This practice was put to an end mostly through the efforts of the Christian missionary William Carey. Secondly, we must immerse ourselves in the truth so we can speak it clearly and well. Does that seem too obvious? Are we not doing that in our churches already? Here’s one way to assess that: How equipped are we to explain that the Bible’s position on slavery is good, not bad? How ready are we to show that Christianity has been the best thing that has happened to women throughout history? We need to know the Bible that well. We need to know Christian history that well. We need to know it specifically as it relates to the lies being promulgated against us. Thirdly, we must be knowledgeable. This includes knowledge of our own revealed Scriptures and our history, as I have just said, but it extends beyond that. The world says Christians are anti-science; we need more Christian Ph.D.s in the sciences. The world says Christians have little or nothing to offer to the great ethical debates of the day; we need to develop and deploy the intellectual firepower fitting the great truth with which God has entrusted us. These are strategic moves the church needs to support. Finally, we must be genuinely good. We are called (for example) to love those who oppose us. What kind of conduct best fits us that calling? The pagan Roman Emperor known as Julian the Apostate complained fiercely about “those impious Galileans” (Christians) practicing compassion toward pagans more lovingly than the pagans did among themselves. Christians’ record of goodness is considerably better than our opponents would have us think, but it seems to me the Lord is calling us, and the times are also calling us, to deeper, more sacrificial acts of goodness. My fear is that these four recommendations will seem too painfully obvious, things the church is doing already. Really, though, how effectively are we responding to the lie? How much effort do we put into this in our churches? How strongly do we encourage our young people to pursue their education—secular or otherwise? How aggressively are we pursuing acts of sacrificial compassion? How clearly do we see that our credibility in the world hangs on this? We live in a tilted world. For the sake of the glory of Christ, we must show that Christianity—that Christ Himself, and His revealed Word—is good and true and desperately crucial for today’s world. To do this we are going to have to aim higher than we have done. We are going to have to equip ourselves more strategically than we have done before, to meet the opposition’s strategies head on. Barring an unforeseen (but not un-prayed for!) work of God, we will not win this battle unless we raise the raise the church’s conversation and practice to a level at which the world will no longer be able to say we are bad and stupid. Tom Gilson is a Campus Crusade for Christ/Cru writer and strategist currently on assignment to BreakPoint. He blogs at ThinkingChristian.net. His new e-book, True Reason, is available here. Articles on the BreakPoint website are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chuck Colson or BreakPoint. Outside links are for informational purposes and do not necessarily imply endorsement of their content. |











Comments:
First of all, thank you for the cordiality you have shown in your posts. It is refreshing to observe a discussion of these kinds of issues while maintaining a mutual respect between the parties.
I think the trouble you're having reconciling the Christian reaction to gay marriage vs our reaction to divorce boils down to this: Divorce is a single instance of sin usually entered into only after months or years of anguish and attempts to prevent it. I don't know of anyone who has gone through a divorce who would welcome the opportunity to do it again. It would be unusual to say that a person has accepted divorce as a lifestyle and will keep on committing the sin of divorce as a chosen way of life. Divorce would be more accurately compared to abortion, which generally is a one time occurence followed by repentance and forgiveness. Christians are very vocal against abortion, but we are also very willing to accept parents who have had abortions and then realize that it was the wrong choice.
Gay marriage, on the other hand, is a complete acceptance of a sin as a way of life which does not involve repentance or any attempt to turn away from the sin. It would be more accurately compared to adultery which would have the same reaction from Christians if the person persists in it and accepts it as a way of life. That is why you see the differing reactions toward a divorcee getting remarried as compared to a gay marriage. The divorcee getting remarried rarely, if ever, enters into another marriage with the goal of getting divorced again, thus they are given grace.
You cannot begin to compare Christians' attitudes toward gay marriage with those toward slavery and racial discrimination. There were Christians and non-Christians on both sides of those issues and neither involved an acceptance of sin as a way of life. There were many Christians who were leaders in the civils rights movement and who actively worked for abolition of slavery. In a few decades, you will not see Christians ashamed of our current stance on gay marriage. We cannot just ignore and accept any sin or we turn our back on Jesus himself. He was always accepting of sinners who repented, but never allowed unrepentant sin to go unchallenged.
As you point out, my claims are true. I'm not trying to distort reality, at least not that I am aware. Rather, I am just trying to better understand the reasons for the focus on homosexual marriage that is, perhaps, not warranted by the statistical data.
What makes an issue an important issue for conservative Christians to focus on?
Is it ration? Frequency? What?
Is divorce and remarry and general acceptance of that among Christians at least not as important an issue as compared to homosexual marriage? What makes the comparatively infrequent number of homosexuals (and their trying to get married) more of a significant issue than much larger number of Christians who divorce and remarry?
To me, Misters Reed and Gilson, the focus of conservative Christians on gay marriage compared to divorce among Christians is hard to make sense of.
You state "statistically, there are far more divorces happening than gay marriages." This is a correct statement. However the reason that we have more divorces than homosexual marriages is there are more hetrosexuals than homosexuals. Homosexuals are a very small percentage of any population so hetrosexuals will always have a higher total number of any problem. For example many homosexual activists point out that most child molesters are hetrosexual. Once again a true fact. But when you look at the total number of child abusers and calculate the percentage of them who are homosexual you will see that homosexuals are much more likely to abuse a child than a hetrosexual. (please note: I am not saying that all or most homosexuals molest children, just more likely)
As Christians we need to have an understanding of our culture and how some try to distort reality for there own gain.
Since divorce is happening at a far more frequent rate compared to homosexual marriage and since Jesus directly spoke about divorce, why is homosexual marriage a more important public policy issue? Can you help me understand? And why would facing divorce as vehemently as homosexual marriage make conservative Christians look more idiotic?
But really, if today we were to pick divorce over gay marriage as a public policy issue to fight, we'd be as idiotic as some people want to portray us to be.
On your other matters, Jacob, you have expressed an opinion, which is duly noted.
So, it seems that there are two tensions here: 1). You focus on the tension between conservative Christians and how they are portrayed by the secular people who discount them as bad etc. 2. You fail to consider the tensions within Christianity and how not all Christians see the world the way you as a conservative sees the world. There are whole subgroups of Christians who do not feel under attack, who do not see the world as tilted or at least not tilted for the reasons that you stated.
I was having a conversation recently with a self described "strong conservative evangelical" and I asked what is more pressing issue for Christians today: divorce or gay marriage. He said gay marriage. Yet, statistically, there are far more divorces happening than gay marriages. We talked about what Jesus said regarding divorcees getting remarried in the Gospels -- as you know Jesus explicitly spoke against that practice and yet it is a far more acceptable sin than gay marriage. Why, do you suppose, a preacher will officiate a divorcee getting remarried but not a gay marriage? Why, do you suppose, a preacher will attend their divorced brother or son getting remarried but not the first wedding of their gay son or brother? It is something that I have been pondering recently.
In terms of putting these things into historical perspective, Ed Stetzer recently wrote something about Richard Land to the effect: Southern Baptists were on the wrong side of the hose during the civil rights struggles of the 1950s and 1960s and the founding of the SBC was tainted by support for slavery, so they lack moral authority to speak on race matters today -- listen more than talk. When it comes to gay marriage as a civil and legal rights issue, I think that Southern Baptists and other conservatives will, in a few decades, be pondering issues similar to their racially dubious past.